the glass tip broke so they were not able to draw it from the vial; The initial case was missing the following minimum criteria: no adverse event (Product complaint only – the vaccine was not administered to the patient). Upon receipt of follow-up information on 10Jan2025, this case now contains all required information to be considered valid (reportability assessment received). This is a spontaneous report received from a Pharmacist from product quality group, Program ID. An 83-year-old female patient received rsv vaccine prot.subunit pref 2v (ABRYSVO), as dose 1, single (Lot number: KC7884, Expiration Date: Sep2025) for immunisation. The patient’s relevant medical history and concomitant medications were not reported. The following information was reported: DEVICE ISSUE (non-serious), described as “the glass tip broke so they were not able to draw it from the vial”. Additional information: A pharmacist reporter reported that he would like to get a replacement for an Abrysvo vaccine because when trying to administer it, the glass tip broke so they were not able to draw it from the vial and the patient was not able to get vaccinated because this was their only remaining dose. The presentation of this Abrysvo was the little sealed vacuum one with the vial and one cap and one syringe and it was not the pack of five. The reporter discarded the antigen vial, vial adaptor, diluent syringe and has no lots, expiry dates, NDC numbers or manufacturer names to provide from those components to provide; however, the reporter kept the box with the box lot number. The box was not damaged and was not squished. The complaint sample was not available to return. The reporter considered “the glass tip broke so they were not able to draw it from the vial” not related to rsv vaccine prot.subunit pref 2v. Causality for “the glass tip broke so they were not able to draw it from the vial” was determined associated to device constituent of rsv vaccine prot.subunit pref 2v (malfunction).